Personhood is always redefined to exclude the intended victim class. Inthe Nuremberg Laws codified the exclusion of Jews from German society. The next year, the Reichsgericht Germany's highest court essentially legalized the Holocaust. Cartoons routinely depicted Jews as pigs, dogs, rats, and other vermin.
August 15, Abortion Viewed in Moral Terms: By contrast, the public is much less likely to see other issues involving human embryos — such as stem cell research or in vitro fertilization — as a matter of morality. Asked whether abortion is morally acceptable, morally wrong or not a moral issue, only about a quarter of U.
Asked about the morality of medical research that uses embryonic stem cells, more than a third of U. The percentage of U. By comparison, about a third of U. The margin of error for the survey is plus or minus 2. Morality of Abortion Roughly half of U. Opinions on the morality of abortion differ widely among religious groups.
Relatively small percentages of people in all religious groups consider it morally acceptable to have an abortion. This pattern holds for nearly all major religious groups. However, Hispanic Catholics who attend Mass at least once a week do not differ significantly from those who attend less often in their views about the moral acceptability of abortion.
There are sizable differences in opinions about the moral acceptability of abortion by partisanship, political ideology and education, but few differences when it comes to gender and age. Those with fewer years of formal schooling also are more inclined to consider abortion morally wrong.
By comparison, men and women are about equally likely to say having an abortion is morally wrong.
And those ages 50 and older tend to hold similar viewpoints about the moral acceptability of abortion as those ages 18 to Morality of Medical Research Using Stem Cells More Americans consider embryonic stem cell research to be morally acceptable than say the same about having an abortion. As with abortion, men and women are about equally likely to say embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable.
Similarly, adults ages 50 and older are about equally likely as younger adults 18 to 49 years to say that conducting embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable. However, college graduates are somewhat more inclined than those with less education to consider this practice morally acceptable.
There also are differences when it comes to partisanship and ideology.
About three-quarters of Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party consider embryonic stem cell research either morally acceptable or not a moral issue. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more inclined than their Democratic counterparts to consider such research morally wrong.
Similarly, self-described conservatives tend to see embryonic stem cell research as morally wrong more than either moderates or liberals do. Among the major religious groups, white evangelical Protestants are most likely to say embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong.
However, in comparison to attitudes toward abortion, differences among religious groups are relatively modest. A separate question on the survey asked about the moral acceptability of medical research using stem cells that do not derive from human embryos.
There are only modest differences in opinion among social and demographic groups on this issue. For example, there are no significant differences in opinion on non-embryonic stem cell research by political party and only modest differences by ideology.
However, moderates and liberals are somewhat more inclined than conservatives to say non-embryonic research is not a moral issue. And those with a college degree are more likely than those with fewer years of formal education to say that non-embryonic stem cell research is morally acceptable.Post-Abortion Healing.
If you or someone you know is suffering after abortion, confidential non-judgmental help is available: Call Project Rachel's national toll-free number: HOPE() or visit caninariojana.com Spanish-speakers may visit caninariojana.com I have said many times that I am a single-issue voter.
I do not believe that being right on any single issue qualifies a candidate for office. But I do believe that being wrong on certain issues can disqualify a candidate. My thinking on this was shaped nearly 20 years ago by an article I read from John Piper.I recommend that you read the whole thing, but here is the heart of it.
Opponents of abortion rights believe an embryo or fetus is alive and thus abortion is tantamount to murder. Current Status The most controversial of abortion issues . Abortion: A Rational Look at An Emotional Issue [R.C. Sproul, Greg Bailey] on caninariojana.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Summary In this book, Dr.
R.C. Sproul employs his unique perspective as a highly experienced pastor-theologian and a trained philosopher to provide well-considered and compassionate answers to the difficult questions that attend termination of pregnancy.
The issue of abortion hinges on the question of personhood. Nearly everyone believes that persons have a special moral status: Taking the life of another person, barring extreme circumstances, is.
The matter of abortion, the quintessential bioethics topic, raises intensely personal issues for many people. It is a polarising and divisive issue that raises discussions about morals, science, medicine, sexuality, autonomy, religion, and politics.